These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
121 related items for PubMed ID: 1663951
1. Dental implant materials. I. Some effects of preparative procedures on surface topography. Smith DC, Pilliar RM, Chernecky R. J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1045-68. PubMed ID: 1663951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dental implant materials. II. Preparative procedures and surface spectroscopic studies. Smith DC, Pilliar RM, Metson JB, McIntyre NS. J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1069-84. PubMed ID: 1663952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness. Sul YT, Byon E, Wennerberg A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Sep; 23(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 18807558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip. Bailey GM, Gardner JS, Day MH, Kovanda BJ. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998 Sep; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of the Nd:YAG dental laser on plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants: surface alteration and attempted sterilization. Block CM, Mayo JA, Evans GH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992 Sep; 7(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 1299639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface characterization of three titanium dental implants. Fandridis J, Papadopoulos T. Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18332762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. Sela MN, Badihi L, Rosen G, Steinberg D, Kohavi D. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 17484735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials. Lim YJ, Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Barco MT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Oct; 16(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11432653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Do implant surfaces make a difference? Meffert RM. Curr Opin Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 4():104-8. PubMed ID: 9655029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations. Ramaglia L, di Lauro AE, Morgese F, Squillace A. Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy. Weinlaender M, Beumer J, Kenney EB, Lekovic V, Holmes R, Moy PK, Plenk H. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Mar; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Kohles SS, Clark MB, Brown CA, Kenealy JN. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Mar; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to implant materials. Fujioka-Hirai Y, Akagawa Y, Minagi S, Tsuru H, Miyake Y, Suginaka H. J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jul; 21(7):913-20. PubMed ID: 3038919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Spark plasma sintering synthesis of porous nanocrystalline titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Nicula R, Lüthen F, Stir M, Nebe B, Burkel E. Biomol Eng; 2007 Nov; 24(5):564-7. PubMed ID: 17869173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]