These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

205 related items for PubMed ID: 16644232

  • 21. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
    Ureturk EU, Apaydin A.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The modular endoprosthesis for mandibular body replacement. Part 2: finite element analysis of endoprosthesis reconstruction of the mandible.
    Wong RC, Tideman H, Merkx MA, Jansen J, Goh SM.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e487-97. PubMed ID: 22516866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.
    Chuong CJ, Borotikar B, Schwartz-Dabney C, Sinn DP.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15635560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Biomechanical effects of screw fixation in second mandibular reconstruction plate.
    Chang YW, Liu PH.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013 Jan; 2013():3167-70. PubMed ID: 24110400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis.
    Liu YF, Fan YY, Jiang XF, Baur DA.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Nov 15; 16(1):131. PubMed ID: 29141673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
    Oguz Y, Uckan S, Ozden AU, Uckan E, Eser A.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug 15; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
    Cox T, Kohn MW, Impelluso T.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr 15; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of a patient-specific customised plate designs and screws for partial mandibular reconstruction.
    Dutta A, Mukherjee K, Seesala VS, Dutta K, Paul RR, Dhara S, Gupta S.
    Med Eng Phys; 2023 Jan 15; 111():103941. PubMed ID: 36792242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Personalized lattice-structured prosthesis as a graftless solution for mandible reconstruction and prosthetic restoration: A finite element analysis.
    Longhitano GA, Chiarelli M, Prada D, Zavaglia CAC, Maciel Filho R.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr 15; 152():106460. PubMed ID: 38340477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Finite element analysis of low-profile reconstruction plates for atrophic mandibles: a comparison of novel 3D grid and conventional plate designs.
    Guerra RC, de Fátima Borim Pulino B, Salomão Júnior VF, Dos Santos Pereira R, Thieringer FM, Sacco R, Sader R, Vieira EH.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun 15; 28(2):595-603. PubMed ID: 37516667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Finite-element design and optimization of a three-dimensional tetrahedral porous titanium scaffold for the reconstruction of mandibular defects.
    Luo D, Rong Q, Chen Q.
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep 15; 47():176-183. PubMed ID: 28655500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Bridging Plate Development for Treatment of Segmental Bone Defects of the Canine Mandible: Mechanical Tests and Finite Element Method.
    de Freitas EP, Rahal SC, Shimano AC, da Silva JV, Noritomi PY, El-Warrak AO, Melchert A.
    J Vet Dent; 2016 Mar 15; 33(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 27487652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Study by finite element method of the mechanical stress of selected biodegradable osteosynthesis screws in sagittal ramus osteotomy.
    Maurer P, Holweg S, Knoll WD, Schubert J.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb 15; 40(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 11883977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of locking and non-locking reconstruction plate-screw system in lateral mandibular defects by finite element analysis.
    Muftuoglu G, Bayram B, Aydin P.
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep 15; 122(4):e65-e69. PubMed ID: 33161169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Finite element analysis of stress distribution on reconstructed mandibular models for autogenous bone grafts.
    Kucukguven MB, Akkocaoğlu M.
    Technol Health Care; 2020 Sep 15; 28(3):249-258. PubMed ID: 31594270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Titanium-coated hollow screw and reconstruction plate system (THORP) in mandibular reconstruction.
    Hellem S, Olofsson J.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1988 May 15; 16(4):173-83. PubMed ID: 3290261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Newly designed retentive posts of mandibular reconstruction plate in oral cancer patients based on preliminary FEM study.
    Kwon IJ, Eo MY, Park SJ, Kim SM, Lee JH.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov 21; 14(1):292. PubMed ID: 27871294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of two osteosynthesis methods on stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Maurer P, Knoll WD, Schubert J.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct 21; 31(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 14563328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Finite element analysis of stress distribution on the mandible and condylar fracture osteosynthesis during various clenching tasks.
    Hijazi L, Hejazi W, Darwich MA, Darwich K.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec 21; 20(4):359-367. PubMed ID: 27663241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.