These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 16648006

  • 1. The magnetoencephalographic response to upright and inverted face stimuli in a patient with Williams syndrome.
    Nakamura M, Watanabe S, Gunji A, Kakigi R.
    Pediatr Neurol; 2006 May; 34(5):412-4. PubMed ID: 16648006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
    Hsiao FJ, Hsieh JC, Lin YY, Chang Y.
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
    Kloth N, Dobel C, Schweinberger SR, Zwitserlood P, Bölte J, Junghöfer M.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T, Viggiano MP.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Specificity of face processing without awareness.
    Zhou G, Zhang L, Liu J, Yang J, Qu Z.
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):408-12. PubMed ID: 20116293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.
    Hussain Z, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ.
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2273-84. PubMed ID: 19555706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison.
    Epstein RA, Higgins JS, Parker W, Aguirre GK, Cooperman S.
    Neuropsychologia; 2006 Sep; 44(7):1145-58. PubMed ID: 16303149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
    Itier RJ, Herdman AT, George N, Cheyne D, Taylor MJ.
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct 18; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Oscillatory characteristics of face-evoked neuromagnetic responses.
    Hsiao FJ, Lin YY, Hsieh JC, Wu ZA, Ho LT, Chang Y.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug 18; 61(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 16213044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
    Isaac L, Lincoln A.
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov 18; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H, Brady N.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May 18; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Steady-state visual-evoked response to upright and inverted geometrical faces: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Tsuruhara A, Inui K, Kakigi R.
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Mar 06; 562():19-23. PubMed ID: 24412129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
    Schweinberger SR, Kaufmann JM, Moratti S, Keil A, Burton AM.
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec 12; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Toddlers with Williams syndrome process upright but not inverted faces holistically.
    Cashon CH, Ha OR, DeNicola CA, Mervis CB.
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2013 Nov 12; 43(11):2549-57. PubMed ID: 23494560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants.
    de Haan M, Pascalis O, Johnson MH.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb 15; 14(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 11970786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Holistic processing of faces: learning effects with Mooney faces.
    Latinus M, Taylor MJ.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug 15; 17(8):1316-27. PubMed ID: 16197686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ.
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec 15; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Developmental differences in the neural bases of the face inversion effect show progressive tuning of face-selective regions to the upright orientation.
    Passarotti AM, Smith J, DeLano M, Huang J.
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb 15; 34(4):1708-22. PubMed ID: 17188904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased.
    Wiese H, Stahl J, Schweinberger SR.
    Biol Psychol; 2009 May 15; 81(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 19428974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods.
    Trujillo LT, Peterson MA, Kaszniak AW, Allen JJ.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan 15; 116(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 15589196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.