These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1157 related items for PubMed ID: 16650679

  • 1. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Ruamviboonsuk P, Teerasuwanajak K, Tiensuwan M, Yuttitham K, Thai Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MD.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP, Aiello LM, Cavallerano JD, Katalinic P, Hock K, Tolson A, Kirby R, Bursell SE, Aiello LP.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Suansilpong A, Rawdaree P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
    Schiffman RM, Jacobsen G, Nussbaum JJ, Desai UR, Carey JD, Glasser D, Zimmer-Galler IE, Zeimer R, Goldberg MF.
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005 Sep; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group.
    Gonzalez ME, Gonzalez C, Stern MP, Arredondo B, Martinez S.
    Arch Med Res; 1995 Sep; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 7620277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
    Ruamviboonsuk P, Wongcumchang N, Surawongsin P, Panyawatananukul E, Tiensuwan M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography.
    Strøm C, Sander B, Larsen N, Larsen M, Lund-Andersen H.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11773037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Automated analysis of retinal images for detection of referable diabetic retinopathy.
    Abràmoff MD, Folk JC, Han DP, Walker JD, Williams DF, Russell SR, Massin P, Cochener B, Gain P, Tang L, Lamard M, Moga DC, Quellec G, Niemeijer M.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 23494039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Software for reading and grading diabetic retinopathy: Aravind Diabetic Retinopathy Screening 3.0.
    Perumalsamy N, Prasad NM, Sathya S, Ramasamy K.
    Diabetes Care; 2007 Sep; 30(9):2302-6. PubMed ID: 17507695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
    Yang Y, Vitale S, Ding Y, O'Connell SR, Alexander J, Bressler NM, Schachat AP, Zeimer R.
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003 Sep; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation.
    Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6753-61. PubMed ID: 20574011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald HR.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 15121388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
    Kinyoun JL, Martin DC, Fujimoto WY, Leonetti DL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
    Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Binnie M, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Leese GP.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Krupinski EA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
    Maberley D, Morris A, Hay D, Chang A, Hall L, Mandava N.
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 58.