These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

656 related items for PubMed ID: 16651950

  • 1. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture.
    Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, Mills BB, Feldstein ML, Ruff GL.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1769-80. PubMed ID: 16651950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative study of a barbed suture, poliglecaprone and stapler in Pfannenstiel incisions performed for benign gynecological procedures: a randomized trial.
    Naki MM, Api O, Acioglu HC, Ozkan S, Kars B, Unal O.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Nov; 89(11):1473-7. PubMed ID: 20919804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures.
    Rubin JP, Hunstad JP, Polynice A, Gusenoff JA, Schoeller T, Dunn R, Walgenbach KJ, Hansen JE.
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Feb; 34(2):272-83. PubMed ID: 24421408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery.
    Peleg D, Ahmad RS, Warsof SL, Marcus-Braun N, Sciaky-Tamir Y, Ben Shachar I.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 218(3):343.e1-343.e7. PubMed ID: 29496259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Barbed vs conventional suture at cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Agarwal S, D'Souza R, Ryu M, Maxwell C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jun; 100(6):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 33404082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Use of a barbed suture in the closure of hip and knee arthroplasty wounds.
    Levine BR, Ting N, Della Valle CJ.
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep 09; 34(9):e473-5. PubMed ID: 21902135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A randomized study comparing traditional monofilament knotted sutures with barbed knotless sutures for donor leg wound closure in coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Krishnamoorthy B, Shepherd N, Critchley WR, Nair J, Devan N, Nasir A, Barnard JB, Venkateswaran RV, Waterworth PD, Fildes JE, Yonan N.
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Feb 09; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 26590381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Barbed Sutures in Body-Contouring: Outcome Analysis of 695 Procedures in 623 Patients and Technical Advances.
    Duscher D, Pollhammer MS, Wenny R, Shamiyeh A, Schmidt M, Huemer GM.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Dec 09; 40(6):815-821. PubMed ID: 27699462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Closure of skin incision after thyroidectomy through a supraclavicular approach: a comparison between tissue adhesive and staples.
    Yang YL, Xiang YY, Jin LP, Pan YF, Zhou SM, Zhang XH, Qu JM.
    Scand J Surg; 2013 Dec 09; 102(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 24056141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Randomized Controlled Trial of Octyl Cyanoacrylate Skin Adhesive versus Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure after Implantable Venous Port Placement.
    Martin JG, Hollenbeck ST, Janas G, Makar RA, Pabon-Ramos WM, Suhocki PV, Miller MJ, Sopko DR, Smith TP, Kim CY.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan 09; 28(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 27836404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct 09; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J, Khalifeh A, Pettker C, Berghella V, Dabbish N, Mackeen AD.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov 09; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr 09; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C, Verma A, Soni A, Thusoo M, Mahajan VK, Verma S.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct 09; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of barbed versus conventional sutures for wound closure of radiologically implanted chest ports.
    Ahmed O, Jilani D, Funaki B, Ginsburg M, Sheth S, Giger M, Zangan S.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Sep 09; 25(9):1433-8. PubMed ID: 24912877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial.
    Maki J, Mitoma T, Ooba H, Nakato H, Mishima S, Tani K, Eto E, Yamamoto D, Yamamoto R, Kai K, Tamada T, Akamatsu K, Kawanishi K, Masuyama H.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Sep 09; 6(9):101431. PubMed ID: 39019212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May 09; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.