These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

221 related items for PubMed ID: 16678504

  • 1. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Lim T, Yang S, Kim M, Tchah H.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 141(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 16678504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study.
    Durrie DS, Kezirian GM.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 15721704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
    Patel SV, Maguire LJ, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
    Buzzonetti L, Petrocelli G, Valente P, Tamburrelli C, Mosca L, Laborante A, Balestrazzi E.
    Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
    Montés-Micó R, Rodríguez-Galietero A, Alió JL.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic patients with congenital nystagmus.
    Mahler O, Hirsh A, Kremer I, Barequet IS, Marcovich AL, Nemet P, Levinger S.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Mar; 32(3):464-7. PubMed ID: 16631059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Visual experiences during different stages of LASIK: Zyoptix XP microkeratome vs Intralase femtosecond laser.
    Tan CS, Au Eong KG, Lee HM.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 17098206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes.
    Cobo-Soriano R, Calvo MA, Beltrán J, Llovet FL, Baviera J.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1357-65. PubMed ID: 16105607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers.
    Twa MD, Lembach RG, Bullimore MA, Roberts C.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 16023065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Ortiz D, Alió JL, Piñero D.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
    Padmanabhan P, Mrochen M, Basuthkar S, Viswanathan D, Joseph R.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
    Patel S, Alió JL, Artola A.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Refractive and aberrometric outcomes of intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus: mechanical versus femtosecond-assisted procedures.
    Piñero DP, Alio JL, El Kady B, Coskunseven E, Morbelli H, Uceda-Montanes A, Maldonado MJ, Cuevas D, Pascual I.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1675-87. PubMed ID: 19643498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.
    Lin MY, Chang DC, Hsu WM, Wang IJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, García-Lázaro S, Cerviño-Expósito A.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1934-44. PubMed ID: 21029903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.