These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
219 related items for PubMed ID: 16696963
1. Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Linko S, Kouri TT, Toivonen E, Ranta PH, Chapoulaud E, Lalla M. Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Oct; 372(1-2):54-64. PubMed ID: 16696963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers. Wah DT, Wises PK, Butch AW. Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 15842056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, Preechaborisutkul B. Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug; 358(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16018883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX - a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser. Zaman Z, Fogazzi GB, Garigali G, Croci MD, Bayer G, Kránicz T. Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Feb; 411(3-4):147-54. PubMed ID: 19861122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy. Chien TI, Kao JT, Liu HL, Lin PC, Hong JS, Hsieh HP, Chien MJ. Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Sep; 384(1-2):28-34. PubMed ID: 17604012 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis. Akin OK, Serdar MA, Cizmeci Z, Genc O, Aydin S. Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2009 Jun; 53(Pt 2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19021504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A multicenter evaluation of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer body fluids module and comparison with hemacytometer cell counts. Butch AW, Wises PK, Wah DT, Gornet TG, Fritsche HA. Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 129(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 18285268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer]. Park J, Kim J. Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting. Shayanfar N, Tobler U, von Eckardstein A, Bestmann L. Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007 Aug; 45(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17635081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method. Sutheesophon K, Wiwanitkit V, Boonchalermvichian C, Charuruks N. J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85 Suppl 1():S246-52. PubMed ID: 12188419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results--a multicenter study. Regeniter A, Haenni V, Risch L, Köchli HP, Colombo JP, Frei R, Huber AR. Clin Nephrol; 2001 May; 55(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 11393384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 fully-automated urine analyzers to manual urine microscopy. Bakan E, Ozturk N, Baygutalp NK, Polat E, Akpinar K, Dorman E, Polat H, Bakan N. Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016 Oct 15; 26(3):365-375. PubMed ID: 27812305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance Verification of the Iris iQ200 Sprint Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzer in a Hospital Routine Laboratory. Cui M, Ju S, Shi Y, Jing R. Clin Lab; 2017 Oct 01; 63(10):1607-1612. PubMed ID: 29035449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments. Mayo S, Acevedo D, Quiñones-Torrelo C, Canós I, Sancho M. J Clin Lab Anal; 2008 Oct 01; 22(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 18623125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the performances of the iQ(®)200 ELITE automated urine microscopy analyser and comparison with manual microscopy method]. Dewulf G, Harrois D, Mazars E, Cattoen C, Canis F. Pathol Biol (Paris); 2011 Oct 01; 59(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 19942378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of the Iris iQ200 body fluid module with manual hemacytometer count. Walker TJ, Nelson LD, Dunphy BW, Anderson DM, Kickler TS. Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar 01; 131(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 19228639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination. Xiang D, Cong Y, Wang C, Yue J, Ma X, Lu Y, Liu P, Ma J. Clin Lab; 2012 Mar 01; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Manual urine microscopy versus automated urine analyzer microscopy in patients with acute kidney injury. Sharda N, Bakhtar O, Thajudeen B, Meister E, Szerlip H. Lab Med; 2014 Mar 01; 45(4):e152-5. PubMed ID: 25425026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Atellica® UAS 800: a new member of the automated urine sediment analyzer family. Aper SJA, Gijzen K, Luimstra JJ, van der Valk JTMH, Russcher A, Koçer RG, Liesting EC, Jacobs LHJ, Lentjes EGWM, Demir AY. Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2021 Nov 01; 81(7):585-592. PubMed ID: 34686074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]