These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Young people and sexual health: whose rights? Whose responsibilities? R. (on the application of Axon) v. Secretary of State for Health & another. Bridgeman J. Med Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 14(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 16963473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception. Jones RK, Boonstra H. Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004 Jun; 36(5):182-91. PubMed ID: 15519960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In strictest confidence. French K. Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2005 Dec; 12(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 16381226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [6/6 consultation of a minor]. Soins Psychiatr; 2009 Dec; (265):45-6. PubMed ID: 19927868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services. Blasdell J. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002 Dec; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Role of parents for adolescent's outpatient clinic]. Cosseron F, Baqué O, Girardon N. Arch Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 13(6):748-50. PubMed ID: 16697165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents. Ehrlich JS. Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003 Jun; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception. Arons JR. William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors. Scuder AC. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002 Mar; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The case of the pregnant adolescent. Peltier BN, Hoover T, Zarkowski P, Patterson T. J Am Coll Dent; 2011 Mar; 78(4):48-55. PubMed ID: 22416619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M. Ohio State Law J; 1996 Mar; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Your parents or the judge: Massachusetts' new abortion consent law. Donovan P. Fam Plann Perspect; 1981 Mar; 13(5):224-8. PubMed ID: 7286173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bad girls or big brother? Fallon D. Paediatr Nurs; 2006 Feb; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 16518944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective abortions for minors: impact of the new law in France. Vendittelli F, Pons JC. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jan; 130(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 16423445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases. Guggenheim M. Hofstra Law Rev; 2002 Aug; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS. Yale J Law Fem; 1998 Aug; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof. Webster RD, Neustadt AN, Whitaker AK, Gilliam ML. Contraception; 2010 Oct; 82(4):310-3. PubMed ID: 20851223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001). Rosenberg SP. Conn Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]