These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

647 related items for PubMed ID: 16700116

  • 1. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA.
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 Mar; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996 Mar; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H.
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC.
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M.
    N D Law Rev; 2001 Mar; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001 Mar; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
    Berkowitz JF.
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2001 Jun; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L.
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD.
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD.
    Houst Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
    Ching B.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2000 Jul; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH.
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997 Jul; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE.
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000 Jul; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Graines S, Wyatt J.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1999 Jul; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion?
    Gauthier AM.
    New Engl Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.