These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


140 related items for PubMed ID: 16701027

  • 1. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
    Chen J, Yang L.
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP.
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [A psychophysical evaluation of NIOSH Lifting Equation in a Chinese young male population: a pilot study].
    Xiao GB, Liang YX.
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 18771617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE, Taboun SM.
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002 Jun; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Can Chinese MAWL be used for designing manual handling tasks?
    Chen YL.
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003 Jun; 64(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 12570404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH, Wu SP, Hsu SH.
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers.
    Lee TH.
    Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.
    Abadi AS, Mazlomi A, Saraji GN, Zeraati H, Hadian MR, Jafari AH.
    Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP, van Oostrom SH, Duijzer K, van Dieën JH.
    Ergonomics; 2012 Oct; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity.
    Dempsey PG, Ayoub MM, Westfall PH.
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1222-41. PubMed ID: 9715677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S, Hamrick CA.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.