These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


236 related items for PubMed ID: 16703095

  • 1. Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice.
    Thornley PH, Stewardson DA, Rout PG, Burke FJ.
    Br Dent J; 2006 May 13; 200(9):515-9; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 16703095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
    Goren AD, Dunn SM, Van der Stelt PF.
    N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr 13; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb 13; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M.
    Swed Dent J; 1989 Feb 13; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Efficiency of the Thai processing solution in clinical practice].
    Chongruk C.
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1989 Feb 13; 39(6):219-25. PubMed ID: 2640671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A clinical trial of the Nomad portable X-ray unit.
    Brooks SL, McMinn WE, Benavides E.
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb 13; 91(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 19288662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007 Feb 13; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations.
    Swart TJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul 13; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
    Winstanley TD.
    Dent Update; 1996 Jul 13; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
    Brocklebank LM.
    Dent Update; 1998 Jun 13; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
    Geist JR, Gleason MJ.
    J Endod; 1995 Apr 13; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Hayakawa Y, Shibuya H, Ota Y, Kuroyanagi K.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb 13; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Quality of dental radiographs. A sample from 52 general practices].
    Mol A, Hack B, van Aken J, van Straaten FJ, van Foreest JD.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1989 Dec 13; 96(12):580-3. PubMed ID: 2639266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.