These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
259 related items for PubMed ID: 16709791
1. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, Bettex D, Baumert B, Leschka S, Desbiolles LM, Marincek B, Boehm T. Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16709791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC, Lachnitt A, Hein PA, Dohmen PM, Thiele H. Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 19060789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis. Stoddard MF, Arce J, Liddell NE, Peters G, Dillon S, Kupersmith J. Am Heart J; 1991 Nov; 122(5):1415-22. PubMed ID: 1951006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography]. Morelli S, De Castro S, Cartoni D, Perrone C, Beni S, Bernardo ML, Ferrante L, Giordano M. G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 25(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 7557034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography. Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J, Gutersohn A, Buck T, Bartel T, Erbel R. Cardiology; 2008 Dec; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area. Halpern EJ, Mallya R, Sewell M, Shulman M, Zwas DR. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1668-73. PubMed ID: 19457833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Blot-Souletie N, Hébrard A, Acar P, Carrié D, Puel J. Echocardiography; 2007 Nov; 24(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18001360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]