These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 16711752

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
    Teramoto R, Fukunishi H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R, Fukunishi H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Apr; 47(5):1858-67. PubMed ID: 17685604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New scoring functions for virtual screening from molecular dynamics simulations with a quantum-refined force-field (QRFF-MD). Application to cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
    Ferrara P, Curioni A, Vangrevelinghe E, Meyer T, Mordasini T, Andreoni W, Acklin P, Jacoby E.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Apr; 46(1):254-63. PubMed ID: 16426061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Unbiasing scoring functions: a new normalization and rescoring strategy.
    Carta G, Knox AJ, Lloyd DG.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Apr; 47(4):1564-71. PubMed ID: 17552493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A discussion of measures of enrichment in virtual screening: comparing the information content of descriptors with increasing levels of sophistication.
    Bender A, Glen RC.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005 Apr; 45(5):1369-75. PubMed ID: 16180913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening.
    Yang JM, Chen YF, Shen TW, Kristal BS, Hsu DF.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005 Apr; 45(4):1134-46. PubMed ID: 16045308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R, Fukunishi H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 18229906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of binary QSAR models derived from LUDI and MOE scoring functions for structure based virtual screening.
    Prathipati P, Saxena AK.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Feb; 46(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 16426038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Scoring ligand similarity in structure-based virtual screening.
    Zavodszky MI, Rohatgi A, Van Voorst JR, Yan H, Kuhn LA.
    J Mol Recognit; 2009 Feb; 22(4):280-92. PubMed ID: 19235177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions.
    Mpamhanga CP, Chen B, McLay IM, Ormsby DL, Lindvall MK.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005 Feb; 45(4):1061-74. PubMed ID: 16045302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.