These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 16712585

  • 1. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH, Havik MM, Bekker EM, Postma A.
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH, Vogel RO, Postma A.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S, Philipp AM, Koch I.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cue repetition increases inhibition of return.
    Dukewich KR, Boehnke SE.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec 31; 448(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 18973792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing.
    Adam JJ, Koch I.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep 31; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An event-related potential study of supramodal attentional control and crossmodal attention effects.
    Green JJ, McDonald JJ.
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar 31; 43(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16712586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M, Postma A, De Haan E.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb 31; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Exogenous phasic alerting and spatial orienting in mild cognitive impairment compared to healthy ageing: Study outcome is related to target response.
    Tales A, Snowden RJ, Phillips M, Haworth J, Porter G, Wilcock G, Bayer A.
    Cortex; 2011 Feb 31; 47(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 19846073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Orienting of attention, pupil size, and the norepinephrine system.
    Gabay S, Pertzov Y, Henik A.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan 31; 73(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21258914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cueing method biases in visual detection studies.
    Jaffard M, Benraiss A, Longcamp M, Velay JL, Boulinguez P.
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov 07; 1179():106-18. PubMed ID: 17894934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
    Moresi S, Adam JJ, Rijcken J, Van Gerven PW.
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb 27; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch.
    Miles E, Brown R, Poliakoff E.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May 27; 64(5):871-88. PubMed ID: 20931419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.