These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

692 related items for PubMed ID: 16716491

  • 1. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z, Zareian P.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
    Komoto Y, Shimoya K, Shimizu T, Kimura T, Hayashi S, Temma-Asano K, Kanagawa T, Fukuda H, Murata Y.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.
    Lyell DJ, Caughey AB, Hu E, Daniels K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 16055575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].
    Doret M, Gaucherand P.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 18495379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and intraabdominal adhesions.
    Lyell DJ, Caughey AB, Hu E, Blumenfeld Y, El-Sayed YY, Daniels K.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):515.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22463952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Two cases of significant postoperative morbidity following peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section.
    Owen R, Polson D.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jan; 29(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 19280506
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Transverse uterine incision non-closure versus closure: an experimental study in sheep.
    Gül A, Simşek Y, Uğraş S, Gül T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):813-7. PubMed ID: 11304961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
    Malomo OO, Kuti O, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Sule SS.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.
    Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug 11; 2014(8):CD000163. PubMed ID: 25110856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.