These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 16716511

  • 21. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E, Prime DJ, Jolicoeur P.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.
    Zhang D, Zhou X, Martens S.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2604-14. PubMed ID: 19465037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A, Müller HJ.
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug 04; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK, Jha AP.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan 04; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of early cortical networks in efficient and inefficient visual search: an event-related potential study.
    Leonards U, Palix J, Michel C, Ibanez V.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Oct 01; 15(7):1039-51. PubMed ID: 14614814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
    Hilimire MR, Hickey C, Corballis PM.
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr 01; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects.
    Galashan D, Wittfoth M, Fehr T, Herrmann M.
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul 01; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R, Katayama J.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb 01; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC, Ruthruff E, Goodin Z, Remington RW.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun 01; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Neural correlates of age-related visual search decline: a combined ERP and sLORETA study.
    Lorenzo-López L, Amenedo E, Pascual-Marqui RD, Cadaveira F.
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jun 01; 41(2):511-24. PubMed ID: 18395470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Analyzing a complex visuomotor tracking task with brain-electrical event related potentials.
    Hill H, Raab M.
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005 Feb 01; 24(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15949581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc.
    Brisson B, Robitaille N, Jolicoeur P.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct 08; 18(15):1627-30. PubMed ID: 17885614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
    Xu X, Liu C.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug 01; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Unavoidable errors: a spatio-temporal analysis of time-course and neural sources of evoked potentials associated with error processing in a speeded task.
    Vocat R, Pourtois G, Vuilleumier P.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug 01; 46(10):2545-55. PubMed ID: 18533202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Feature processing during visual search in normal aging: electrophysiological evidence.
    Lorenzo-López L, Amenedo E, Cadaveira F.
    Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Jul 01; 29(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 17346855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Influence of task difficulty on the features of event-related potential during visual oddball task.
    Kim KH, Kim JH, Yoon J, Jung KY.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov 14; 445(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 18790010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT, Stockburger J, Bublatzky F, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO.
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep 16; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Two-object attentional interference depends on attentional set.
    López M, Rodríguez V, Valdés-Sosa M.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Jul 16; 53(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 15210290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Brain mechanisms underlying visual perception and visual mental imagery of Chinese pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study.
    Qiu J, Li H, Liu Q, Zhang Q.
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec 12; 1184():202-9. PubMed ID: 18028887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Processing 3D form and 3D motion: respective contributions of attention-based and stimulus-driven activity.
    Paradis AL, Droulez J, Cornilleau-Pérès V, Poline JB.
    Neuroimage; 2008 Dec 12; 43(4):736-47. PubMed ID: 18805496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.