These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

465 related items for PubMed ID: 16720441

  • 1. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The Clarion cochlear implant--technical principles, initial clinical experiences and results].
    Lenarz T, Battmer RD.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8851112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implant: a one year follow-up.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2005 Jan; 16(2-3):127-37. PubMed ID: 16285465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 67(8):873-80. PubMed ID: 12880667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA, Litvak LM, Hughes ML.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C, Riss D, Kaider A, Mair A, Wagenblast J, Baumgartner WD, Gstöttner W, Hamzavi JS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, Piron JP, Ribas S, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Mondain M, Uziel A, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Correlation between electrically-induced stapedius reflex and discomfort threshold in cochlear implant patients].
    Gattaz G, Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Gnadeberg D.
    HNO; 1992 Dec; 40(12):480-3. PubMed ID: 1493968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R, Kishon-Rabin L, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Reeder RM, Raulie JC.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term follow-up of infants (4-11 months) fitted with cochlear implants.
    Colletti L.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 129(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 19153846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Delayed perception of cochlear implant stimulation in children with postmeningitic ossified cochleae.
    Geier L, Gilden J, Luetje CM, Maddox HE.
    Am J Otol; 1993 Nov; 14(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 8296858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Preliminary results on correlation between neural response imaging and 'most comfortable levels' in cochlear implantation.
    Akin I, Kuran G, Saka C, Vural M.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Apr; 120(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 16623968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.