These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
119 related items for PubMed ID: 16732059
21. Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study. Burzotta F, Paloscia L, Trani C, Mascellanti M, Mongiardo R, Materazzo G, Niccoli G, Di Marco M, Leone AM, Porto I, Mazzari MA, Rebuzzi AG, Schiavoni G, Crea F. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Oct; 9(10):1004-10. PubMed ID: 18799962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, O'Neill WW, TandemHeart Investigators Group. Am Heart J; 2006 Sep; 152(3):469.e1-8. PubMed ID: 16923414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of Impella Recover 2.5 left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: experience of a high-volume center. Vecchio S, Chechi T, Giuliani G, Lilli A, Consoli L, Spaziani G, Giannotti F, Margheri M. Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Aug; 56(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18614983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients. Stroupe KT, Morrison DA, Hlatky MA, Barnett PG, Cao L, Lyttle C, Hynes DM, Henderson WG, Investigators of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program #385 (AWESOME: Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation). Circulation; 2006 Sep 19; 114(12):1251-7. PubMed ID: 16966588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Javaid A, Steinberg DH, Buch AN, Corso PJ, Boyce SW, Pinto Slottow TL, Roy PK, Hill P, Okabe T, Torguson R, Smith KA, Xue Z, Gevorkian N, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R. Circulation; 2007 Sep 11; 116(11 Suppl):I200-6. PubMed ID: 17846304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry). Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, Ortolani P, Saia F, Savini C, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Gianstefani S, Virzì S, Manara F, Kiros Weldeab M, Marinelli G, Di Bartolomeo R, Branzi A. Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jul 01; 98(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 16784920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions supported by extracorporeal life support. Vainer J, van Ommen V, Maessen J, Geskes G, Lamerichs L, Waltenberger J. Am J Cardiol; 2007 Mar 15; 99(6):771-3. PubMed ID: 17350362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Apolito RA, Greenberg MA, Menegus MA, Lowe AM, Sleeper LA, Goldberger MH, Remick J, Radford MJ, Hochman JS. Am Heart J; 2008 Feb 15; 155(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 18215596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk factors for mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction. Wang J, Xiao F, Ren J, Li Y, Zhang ML. Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Feb 20; 120(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 17374284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Multivessel coronary drug-eluting stenting alone in patients with significant ischemic mitral regurgitation: a 4-year follow up. Ho PC, Nguyen ME. J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Jan 20; 20(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 18174619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic significance of multiple previous percutaneous coronary interventions in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Thielmann M, Leyh R, Massoudy P, Neuhäuser M, Aleksic I, Kamler M, Herold U, Piotrowski J, Jakob H. Circulation; 2006 Jul 04; 114(1 Suppl):I441-7. PubMed ID: 16820616 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Is informed consent in cardiac surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention achievable? Larobina ME, Merry CJ, Negri JC, Pick AW. ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul 04; 77(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 17610687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term survival after surgery versus percutaneous intervention in octogenarians with multivessel coronary disease. Dacey LJ, Likosky DS, Ryan TJ, Robb JF, Quinn RD, DeVries JT, Hearne MJ, Leavitt BJ, Dunton RF, Clough RA, Sisto D, Ross CS, Olmstead EM, O'Connor GT, Malenka DJ, Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Dec 04; 84(6):1904-11; discussion 1904-11. PubMed ID: 18036905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgery as early revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Yavuz S. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Nov 04; 8 Suppl 2():84-92. PubMed ID: 19028640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary revascularisation: results from a large, population-based cohort with first intervention 1995-2004. Blackledge HM, Squire IB. Heart; 2009 Feb 04; 95(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 19001000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in prevention of perioperative myocardial infarctions during subsequent vascular surgery. Ward HB, Kelly RF, Thottapurathu L, Moritz TE, Larsen GC, Pierpont G, Santilli S, Goldman S, Krupski WC, Littooy F, Reda DJ, McFalls EO. Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep 04; 82(3):795-800; discussion 800-1. PubMed ID: 16928485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Changing volumes, risk profiles, and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary interventions. Aldea GS, Mokadam NA, Melford R, Stewart D, Maynard C, Reisman M, Goss R. Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jun 04; 87(6):1828-38. PubMed ID: 19463603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis. Chiu FC, Chang SN, Lin JW, Hwang JJ, Chen YS. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Dec 04; 138(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 19660378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment decisions in stable coronary artery disease: insights from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization. Breeman A, Hordijk-Trion M, Lenzen M, Hoeks S, Ottervanger JP, Bertrand ME, Sechtem U, Zaliunas R, Legrand V, de Boer MJ, Stahle E, Mercado N, Wijns W, Boersma E, Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Nov 04; 132(5):1001-9. PubMed ID: 17059915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Percutaneous left ventricular assist device complicated by a patent foramen ovale: importance of identification and management. Loyalka P, Idelchik GM, Kar B. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Sep 04; 70(3):383-6. PubMed ID: 17563095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]