These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
703 related items for PubMed ID: 16733484
1. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening. Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Lyra C, Kandiloros D, Ferekidis E. Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Vohr BR, Weirather Y, Holstrum J. Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs. Benito-Orejas JI, Ramírez B, Morais D, Almaraz A, Fernández-Calvo JL. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns. De Capua B, Costantini D, Martufi C, Latini G, Gentile M, De Felice C. Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Making universal newborn hearing screening a success. Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Nikolopoulos T, Korres GS, Ferekidis E. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 70(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 16029898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of the number of averaged responses on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns. Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Nikolopoulos T, Korres GS, Economou NC, Ferekidis E. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 16140396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response. Suppiej A, Rizzardi E, Zanardo V, Franzoi M, Ermani M, Orzan E. Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Lin HC, Shu MT, Lee KS, Ho GM, Fu TY, Bruna S, Lin G. Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study]. Huang LH, Deng XQ, Yang YL, Wang SJ, Tang XQ, Guo LS, Han DM. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Audiologic evaluation of neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses. Rhee CK, Park HM, Jang YJ. Laryngoscope; 1999 Dec; 109(12):2005-8. PubMed ID: 10591364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates]. Xu FL, Xing QJ, Cheng XY. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry. Mathur NN, Dhawan R. J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program. Kirkim G, Serbetcioglu B, Erdag TK, Ceryan K. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements. Meier S, Narabayashi O, Probst R, Schmuziger N. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in Neonatal Hearing Screening. Levit Y, Himmelfarb M, Dollberg S. Pediatrics; 2015 Sep; 136(3):e641-7. PubMed ID: 26324873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne. Lévêque M, Schmidt P, Leroux B, Danvin JB, Langagne T, Labrousse M, Chays A. Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Wroblewska-Seniuk K, Chojnacka K, Pucher B, Szczapa J, Gadzinowski J, Grzegorowski M. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Oct; 69(10):1351-7. PubMed ID: 15904979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening]. Liao H, Wu Z, Zhou T. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions]. Pedersen L, Møller TR, Wetke R, Ovesen T. Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb 18; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]