These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

246 related items for PubMed ID: 16734311

  • 1. Compomer as a pit and fissure sealant: effectiveness and retention after 24 months.
    Puppin-Rontani RM, Baglioni-Gouvea ME, deGoes MF, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16734311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin used as a fissure sealant: 48-month results.
    Pereira AC, Pardi V, Mialhe FL, Meneghim MC, Basting RT, Werner CW.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):294-6. PubMed ID: 11764120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    de Luca-Fraga LR, Pimenta LA.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of Fluroshield with Delton fissure sealant: four year results.
    Lygidakis NA, Oulis KI.
    Pediatr Dent; 1999 Jun; 21(7):429-31. PubMed ID: 10633516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based material as occlusal sealants: a longitudinal clinical performance.
    Oliveira FS, da Silva SM, Machado MA, Bijella MF, Lima JE, Abdo RC.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008 Jun; 75(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 18647508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Autio-Gold JT.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jun; 27(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 12120768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A 3-year clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants.
    Pereira AC, Pardi V, Mialhe FL, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12744408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fissure sealant in permanent first molars after 10 years.
    Wendt LK, Koch G.
    Swed Dent J; 1988 Feb; 12(5):181-5. PubMed ID: 2975403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M, Liu H.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Feb; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years.
    Forss H, Halme E.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9511837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers used as fissure sealants: twenty-four-month results.
    Pereira AC, Pardi V, Basting RT, Menighim MC, Pinelli C, Ambrosano GM, García-Godoy F.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001 Feb; 68(3):168-74, 150. PubMed ID: 11697308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Retention and caries prevention of Vitremer and Ketac-bond used as occlusal sealants.
    Pereira AC, Basting RT, Pinelli C, de Castro Meneghim M, Werner CW.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 10477984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Inhibition of mineral loss at the enamel/sealant interface of fissures sealed with fluoride- and non-fluoride containing dental materials in vitro.
    Kantovitz KR, Pascon FM, Correr GM, Borges AF, Uchôa MN, Puppin-Rontani RM.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):376-83. PubMed ID: 17123915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial.
    Baseggio W, Naufel FS, Davidoff DC, Nahsan FP, Flury S, Rodrigues JA.
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2010 Nov; 8(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 20848004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Two-year retention and caries rates of UltraSeal XT and FluoroShield light-cured pit and fissure sealants.
    Boksman L, Carson B.
    Gen Dent; 1998 Sep; 46(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 9663075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Garcia L, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effectiveness of a glass ionomer cement used as a pit and fissure sealant in recently erupted permanent first molars.
    Barja-Fidalgo F, Maroun S, de Oliveira BH.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009 Jan; 76(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19341577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yıldız E.
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study.
    Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Van Duinen RN, Skrinjaric I, Hill RG, Lynch E.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.