These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 1674478

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor.
    Hadar E, Biron-Shental T, Gavish O, Raban O, Yogev Y.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25123517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.
    Dowdle MA.
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):501-5. PubMed ID: 12953323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY, Nguyen MT, Darmanjian S, McGorray SP, Euliano N, Onkala A, Gregg AR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Monitoring uterine activity.
    Allman AC, Steer PJ.
    Br J Hosp Med; 2013 Jan; 49(9):649-53. PubMed ID: 8508259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Uterine contractions.
    Harbert GM.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 25(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 7067198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J, Sikora J, Horoba K, Matonia A, Jezewski J, Magnucki J, Kobielska L.
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A brief history of intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Smith RP.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1984 Nov; 129():1-24. PubMed ID: 6395613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT, Arulkumaran S, Yang M.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Jul; 42(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 8103477
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour.
    Jacod BC, Graatsma EM, Van Hagen E, Visser GH.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Wave-form analysis of intrauterine pressure curves with methods and models developed in cardiac research.
    Barclay ML, DeHart W, Mercer JE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun 01; 128(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 860737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.