These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

185 related items for PubMed ID: 16749334

  • 21. [Changes in contrast sensitivity in glaucoma patients].
    Dimofte AD, Rusu V, Dimofte G.
    Oftalmologia; 2004; 48(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 15598055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
    North RV, Jones AL, Hunter E, Morgan JE, Wild JM.
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jun; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F, Centofanti M, Iester M, Rossetti L, Fogagnolo P, Michelessi M, Capris E, Manni G.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Central thickness of the cornea in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D, Danielescu C, Gagos-Zaharia O, Gherman C.
    Oftalmologia; 2007 Jun; 51(3):98-103. PubMed ID: 18064964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation.
    Parikh R, Muliyil J, George R, Bhat S, Thomas R.
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
    Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chu DH, Xu L, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Significance of the peripheral visual field for diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Kaiser HJ, Flammer J, Stümpfig D.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jan; 200(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 1583835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Predicting visual field loss in ocular hypertensive patients using wavelet-fourier analysis of GDx scanning laser polarimetry.
    Essock EA, Gunvant P, Zheng Y, Garway-Heath DF, Kotecha A, Spratt A.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 17502818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial.
    Bengtsson B, Leske MC, Hyman L, Heijl A, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 17097736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Screening for glaucoma in the Chinese elderly population in Singapore.
    Sim DH, Goh LG.
    Singapore Med J; 1999 Oct; 40(10):644-7. PubMed ID: 10741193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Keratometry, optic disc dimensions, and degree and progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
    Jonas JB, Stroux A, Martus P, Budde W.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 16778642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas.
    de la Rosa MG, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Lozano-Lopez V, Mendez MS, de la Vega RR.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Optimizing the distribution and test locations in statistical perimetry. Preliminary results].
    Sugimoto K, Zulauf M, Schötzau A, Rentsch R.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 May; 210(5):302-4. PubMed ID: 9324538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
    Bruun-Jensen J.
    Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC, Fleck BW, Brash HM, Macrae ME, Tan LL, Minns RA.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluating human and automated interpretation of visual field data in perimetry.
    Hirsbrunner HP, Fankhauser F, Funkhouser AT, Jenni A.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1990 Oct; 34(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2194060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Fatigue effect within 10 degrees visual field in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E.
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 25(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 8484656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
    Damato BE, Ahmed J, Allan D, McClure E, Jay JL.
    Eye (Lond); 1989 Apr; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.