These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

165 related items for PubMed ID: 16750875

  • 1. Effect of a posterior dynamic implant adjacent to a rigid spinal fixator.
    Zander T, Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Bergmann G.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Oct; 21(8):767-74. PubMed ID: 16750875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of fusion-bone stiffness on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after vertebral body replacement.
    Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Mar; 21(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 16356613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ, Schmidt H, Werner K, Schmölz W, Drumm J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov 15; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A, Zander T, Burra NK, Bergmann G.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct 15; 50(10):343-7. PubMed ID: 16300050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM, Park C, Lee K, Lee S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep 15; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, Kurtz SM.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL, Chen CS, Lin HM, Huang LY, Liu CL, Huang CH, Cheng CK.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul 01; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The risk of disc prolapses with complex loading in different degrees of disc degeneration - a finite element analysis.
    Schmidt H, Kettler A, Rohlmann A, Claes L, Wilke HJ.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov 01; 22(9):988-98. PubMed ID: 17822814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK, Kim YE, Wang KC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 20; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system.
    Wilke HJ, Heuer F, Schmidt H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb 01; 34(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 19179920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
    Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, Welch WC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov 01; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intradiscal pressure changes with dynamic pedicle screw systems.
    Dath R, Sirkett DM, Gheduzzi S, Miles AW.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun 01; 21(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 18525483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis.
    Rohlmann A, Nabil Boustani H, Bergmann G, Zander T.
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov 16; 43(15):2963-9. PubMed ID: 20696430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TCh, Goel VK.
    Spine J; 2006 Nov 16; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence prediction of injury and vibration on adjacent components of spine using finite element methods.
    Guo LX, Teo EC.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr 16; 19(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 16760786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Buck's direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis restores disc stresses at the involved and adjacent levels.
    Sairyo K, Goel VK, Faizan A, Vadapalli S, Biyani S, Ebraheim N.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Dec 16; 21(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 16959387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of a dynamic stabilization device on disc loading under compression.
    Zhang QH, Zhou YL, Petit D, Teo EC.
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun 16; 31(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 19038569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Hughes J, Smith F, Wardlaw D.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar 15; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.