These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 16752284

  • 1. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years.
    Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ.
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 16752284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Application of acetabulum reinforcement ring for reconstructing acetabular defects in artificial hip replacement].
    Han W, Zhang H.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 23(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 19275103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.
    Akiyama H, Yamamoto K, Tsukanaka M, Kawanabe K, Otsuka H, So K, Goto K, Nakamura T.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21911530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Modified Exeter technique in revision hip surgery].
    de Thomasson E, Guingand O, Terracher R, Mazel C.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 18555861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50].
    Busch VJ, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ, Veth RP, Schreurs BW.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep 01; 151(35):1935-40. PubMed ID: 17907545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study.
    Köster G, Rading S.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 May 01; 129(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18379799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-term fate of uncemented, threaded acetabular components with smooth surface treatment: minimum 10-year follow-up of two different designs.
    Aldinger PR, Thomsen M, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Breusch SJ.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Sep 01; 124(7):469-75. PubMed ID: 15241616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Acetabular reinforcement rings and bone allografts in the reconstructive treatment of periprosthetic bone loss.
    Regis D, Dorigo E, Modena M, Corallo F, Bartolozzi P.
    Chir Organi Mov; 2002 Sep 01; 87(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 12847790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Acetabular revision. The role of rings and cages.
    Schatzker J, Wong MK.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec 01; (369):187-97. PubMed ID: 10611874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.