These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

442 related items for PubMed ID: 16752669

  • 1. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji AO, Olayemi O, Odukogbe AA, Aimakhu CO, Oladokun A, Akindele FO, Adeniji OI, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
    Fox NS, Saltzman DH, Roman AS, Klauser CK, Moshier E, Rebarber A.
    BJOG; 2011 May; 118(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 21332637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M, Singleton C, Atlas RO, Balducci J, Rust OA.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
    Ande AB, Ezeanochie CM, Olagbuji NB.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 97(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 11275035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ.
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M, Eneroth-Grimfors E, Edlund M, Marions L.
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB, Browning J, O'Boyle A, Goodwin TM.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.