These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

85 related items for PubMed ID: 16763929

  • 1. An experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems (initial experiences and physical evaluation).
    Gomi T, Koshida K, Miyati T, Miyagawa J, Hirano H.
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 16763929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
    Gomi T, Miyagawa J, Hirano H.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec 20; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y, Matsumoto M, Suekane K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Dec 20; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M, Sumida I, Ideguchi T, Kawaji Y, Himuro K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Dec 20; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E, Flynn MJ.
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr 20; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L, Pannella A, Bassetti C, Fantinato D, Baldi M, Bertoli G.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Apr 20; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A, Jain A, Bednarek DR, Hoffmann KR, Rudin S.
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb 20; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
    Murai M, Kishimoto K, Tanaka K, Oota K, Ienaga A.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov 20; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T, Takata T, Ichikawa K.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Nov 20; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A, Nakamura S, Nishihara S, Kohama C, Takahata A, Fujikawa K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Nov 20; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measurements of the modulation transfer function, normalized noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency for two flat panel detectors: a fluoroscopic and a cone beam computer tomography flat panel detectors.
    Benítez RB, Ning R, Conover D, Liu S.
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009 Nov 20; 17(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 19923685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL, Xu T, Molloi S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan 07; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E, Buhr E, Granfors P, Vandenbroucke D, Wang X.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug 07; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A quality assurance phantom for the performance evaluation of volumetric micro-CT systems.
    Du LY, Umoh J, Nikolov HN, Pollmann SI, Lee TY, Holdsworth DW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec 07; 52(23):7087-108. PubMed ID: 18029995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fourier Analysis of Noise Characteristics in Cone-Beam Microtomography Laboratory Scanners.
    Jang SY, Kim HK, Youn H, Cho S, Cunningham IA.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jan 07; 64(1):173-183. PubMed ID: 27093307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.