These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1740 related items for PubMed ID: 16768359

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK, Fuchs S, Müller MM.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Independent processing of visual stimulus changes in ventral and dorsal stream features indexed by an early positive difference in event-related brain potentials.
    Kimura M, Katayama J, Murohashi H.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Feb; 59(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 15978688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG, Dinkelbach A, Schubö A.
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan 11; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: a quantitative analysis.
    Stoppel CM, Boehler CN, Sabelhaus C, Heinze HJ, Hopf JM, Schoenfeld MA.
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov 21; 1181():51-60. PubMed ID: 17961522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of visual identity negative priming.
    Frings C, Groh-Bordin C.
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct 24; 1176():82-91. PubMed ID: 17904111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J, Ritter W, Gomes H.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct 24; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ, Strugstad EC, Sehatpour P, Molholm S, Pasieka W, Schroeder CE, McCourt ME.
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep 24; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Inter-individual differences in the polarity of early visual responses and attention effects.
    Proverbio AM, Del Zotto M, Zani A.
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May 29; 419(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 17490815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Are objects the same as groups? ERP correlates of spatial attentional guidance by irrelevant feature similarity.
    Kasai T, Moriya H, Hirano S.
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul 05; 1399():49-58. PubMed ID: 21652032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 87.