These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

305 related items for PubMed ID: 16769277

  • 1. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
    Jablon LK, Ugolini KR, Nahmias NC.
    Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16769277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
    Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, Sofia M, Lombardo R, Cordio S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Totally implantable venous access ports by cephalic vein cut-down for patients receiving chemotherapy].
    Ayadi S, Ksantini R, Maghrebi H, Daghfous A, Ayadi M, Fteriche F, Bedioui H, Chebbi F, Amous A, Jouini M, Kacem M, Mezlini A, Ben Safta Z.
    Tunis Med; 2011 Jul; 89(8-9):699-702. PubMed ID: 21948685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases.
    Chang HM, Hsieh CB, Hsieh HF, Chen TW, Chen CJ, Chan DC, Yu JC, Liu YC, Shen KL.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Feb; 32(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 16289481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Sarzo G, Finco C, Parise P, Savastano S, Vecchiato M, Degregori S, Merigliano S.
    Chir Ital; 2004 Feb; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
    Sarveswaran J, Burke D, Bodenham A.
    Am J Surg; 2007 Nov; 194(5):699. PubMed ID: 17936440
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
    Chen PT, Sung CS, Wang CC, Chan KH, Chang WK, Hsu WH.
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.
    Otsubo R, Hatachi T, Shibata K, Yoshida T, Watanabe H, Oikawa M, Matsumoto M, Yano H, Taniguchi H, Nagayasu T.
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 113(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 26645575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture. Technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
    D'Angelo FA.
    Chir Ital; 2003 Jan; 55(2):313. PubMed ID: 12744114
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
    D'Angelo FA, Ramacciato G, Aurello P, De Angelis R, Amodio P, Magrì M, Barillari P.
    Chir Ital; 2002 Jan; 54(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12239758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Cephalic vein access for implantable venous access devices. Technique and long-term follow-up].
    Conessa C, Talfer S, Herve S, Chollet O, Poncet JL.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002 Jan; 123(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 12577777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
    Henriques HF, Karmy-Jones R, Knoll SM, Copes WS, Giordano JM.
    Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prevention of complications in permanent central venous catheters.
    Takasugi JK, O'Connell TX.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jul; 167(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 3381187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
    Karanlik H, Kurul S.
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep 01; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Guidewire assisted cephalic vein cutdown for insertion of totally implantable access ports.
    Chang HM, Hsieh HF, Hsu SD, Liao GS, Lin CH, Hsieh CB, Yu JC.
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb 01; 95(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 17262733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
    Hoareau-Gruchet F, Rtail R, Sulaj H, Khirnetkina A, Reyt E, Righini CA.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr 01; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Percutaneous versus Cut-Down Technique for Indwelling Port Placement.
    Matiotti-Neto M, Eskander MF, Tabatabaie O, Kasumova G, Bliss LA, Ng SC, Tawa NE, Murphy B, Critchlow JF, Tseng JF.
    Am Surg; 2017 Dec 01; 83(12):1336-1342. PubMed ID: 29336750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
    Horattas MC, Trupiano J, Hopkins S, Pasini D, Martino C, Murty A.
    Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb 01; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Kamat A, Kramer P, Soisson AP.
    W V Med J; 2002 Feb 01; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.