These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 16769830

  • 1. Effect of eye testing order on automated perimetry results using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard 24-2.
    Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Mora R, Liebmann JM, Ritch R.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 124(6):781-4. PubMed ID: 16769830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA, Sherman K, Doyle C, Wall M.
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Jul; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?
    Conway ML, Hosking SL, Zhu H, Cubbidge RP.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec 23; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb 23; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct 21; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast for following visual fields in prepubertal idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Stiebel-Kalish H, Lusky M, Yassur Y, Kalish Y, Shuper A, Erlich R, Lubman S, Snir M.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep 21; 111(9):1673-5. PubMed ID: 15350321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
    Rao HL, Yadav RK, Begum VU, Addepalli UK, Choudhari NS, Senthil S, Garudadri CS.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan 21; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
    Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep 21; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.