These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 16777362

  • 21. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners.
    Cooper HR, Roberts B.
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):11-24. PubMed ID: 17257790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.
    Baumann U, Nobbe A.
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 16442249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
    Nourski KV, Abbas PJ, Miller CA, Robinson BK, Jeng FC.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Angeli SI, Germani R, Messiah S, Arheart KL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli.
    Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 May; 51(5):389-98. PubMed ID: 22201528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Perceptual Spaces Induced by Cochlear Implant All-Polar Stimulation Mode.
    Marozeau J, McKay CM.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep 07; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Reiss LA, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Gantz BJ.
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan 03; 256():43-52. PubMed ID: 24157931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time.
    Vermeire K, Landsberger DM, Van de Heyning PH, Voormolen M, Kleine Punte A, Schatzer R, Zierhofer C.
    Hear Res; 2015 Aug 03; 326():8-14. PubMed ID: 25840373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Multidimensional perceptual development: consistency of responses to frequency and intensity in young chickens.
    Gray L.
    Dev Psychobiol; 1987 May 03; 20(3):299-312. PubMed ID: 3596057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT, Geng ZJ, Zhang Q, Li W, Zhang J.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep 20; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec 20; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug 20; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec 20; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
    Xu Y, Collins LM.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun 20; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
    Helbig S, Baumann U, Helbig M, von Malsen-Waldkirch N, Gstoettner W.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008 Jun 20; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct 20; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.