These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 16784747

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
    Kapustian V, Anteby EY, Gdalevich M, Shenhav S, Lavie O, Gemer O.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.
    Myers SA, Bennett TL.
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):659-62. PubMed ID: 16363753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.
    Lyell DJ, Caughey AB, Hu E, Daniels K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 16055575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].
    Nather A, Zeisler H, Sam CE, Husslein P, Joura EA.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jun 15; 113(11-12):451-3. PubMed ID: 11467092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum during Cesarean sections].
    Woytoń J, Florjański J, Zimmer M.
    Ginekol Pol; 2000 Oct 15; 71(10):1250-4. PubMed ID: 11143933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.
    Weerawetwat W, Buranawanich S, Kanawong M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep 15; 87(9):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15515998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z, Zareian P.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Sep 15; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Clinical observation of Stark cesarean section as secondary abdominal surgery].
    Ma YY, Zhu XL, Dong Y, Wang YQ, Zheng ZM, Zhang RJ, Xu Y, Zhao JJ.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov 15; 40(11):729-31. PubMed ID: 16324243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Nonclosure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
    Roset E, Boulvain M, Irion O.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 May 01; 108(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 12694968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Can the practice of nonclosure of visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean delivery be justified?
    Sholapurkar SL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr 01; 212(4):550. PubMed ID: 25511240
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Short-term effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a prospective randomized study.
    Anteby EY, Kruchkovich J, Kapustian V, Gdalevich M, Shenhav S, Gemer O.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec 01; 35(6):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20144167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can the practice of nonclosure of visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean delivery be justified? Reply.
    Walfisch A, Shrim A, Hallak M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr 01; 212(4):550-1. PubMed ID: 25511242
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.