These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 16808568

  • 1. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Kazandjian S, Kiliaridis S, Mavropoulos A.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshøj M, Melsen B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
    Frongia G, Piancino MG, Bracco AA, Crincoli V, Debernardi CL, Bracco P.
    Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Damstra J, Huddleston Slater JJ, Fourie Z, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Goracci C, Ferrari M.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M, Rigali PH, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH, Palagi LM, Carneiro MS, Almeida MA, Miguel JA.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Jul; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A new method for locating anterior skeletal landmarks from soft tissue measurements.
    Ligthelm-Bakker AS, Prahl-Andersen B, Wattel E, Uljee IH.
    J Biol Buccale; 1991 Dec; 19(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 1791165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
    Tsang KH, Cooke MS.
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.