These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

582 related items for PubMed ID: 16817173

  • 1. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, De Smet F, Karlsson ED, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, De Smet F, De Moor B, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 16817172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM, Heien C, Økland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor and successful vaginal delivery.
    Vankayalapati P, Sethna F, Roberts N, Ngeh N, Thilaganathan B, Bhide A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 18260158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F, Ramalho C, Machado AP, Calado E, Cardoso F, Montenegro N.
    Acta Med Port; 2006 Feb; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M, Bougmiza I, Ben Hmid R, Abdelfatteh W, Mahjoub S, Channoufi MB.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervical assessment at 22 and 27 weeks for the prediction of spontaneous birth before 34 weeks in twin pregnancies: is transvaginal sonography more accurate than digital examination?
    Vayssière C, Favre R, Audibert F, Chauvet MP, Gaucherand P, Tardif D, Grangé G, Novoa A, Descamps P, Perdu M, Andrini E, Janse-Marec J, Maillard F, Nisand I, Research Group in Obstetrics and Gynecology (GROG).
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):707-12. PubMed ID: 16273595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
    Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Variables that predict the success of labor induction.
    Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Salazar F, Pérez-Medina T, Engels V, Archilla B, Izquierdo F, Bajo J.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 16232178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
    Cubal A, Carvalho J, Ferreira MJ, Rodrigues G, Carmo OD.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.