These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 16822476

  • 1. Autogenous particulate bone collected with a piezo-electric surgical device and bone trap: a microbiological and histomorphometric study.
    Sivolella S, Berengo M, Scarin M, Mella F, Martinelli F.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(10):883-91. PubMed ID: 16822476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Osseous coagulum collected in bone traps: potential for bacterial contamination and methods for decontamination.
    Etcheson AW, Miley DD, Gillespie MJ.
    J Oral Implantol; 2007 Oct; 33(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 17674675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Microbial analysis of the autogenous bone collected by bone filter during oral surgery: a clinical study.
    Kürkçü M, Oz IA, Köksal F, Benlidayi ME, Güneşli A.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1593-8. PubMed ID: 16243175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bacterial contamination levels of autogenous bone particles collected by 3 different techniques for harvesting intraoral bone grafts.
    Manzano-Moreno FJ, Herrera-Briones FJ, Linares-Recatala M, Ocaña-Peinado FM, Reyes-Botella C, Vallecillo-Capilla MF.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 73(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 25683043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected during dental implant site preparation: a pilot study.
    Tezulas E, Dilek OC, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):656-60. PubMed ID: 19201221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Bacterial contamination of autogenous bone collected by rongeur compared with that collected by bone filter during implant surgery.
    Hashemi HM, Beshkar M.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 49(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 20828895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microbiologic and histologic assessment of intentional bacterial contamination of bone grafts.
    Yaman F, Unlü G, Atilgan S, Celik Y, Ozekinci T, Yaldiz M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1490-4. PubMed ID: 17656273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected from dental implant sites via osteotomy: a review.
    Tezulas E, Dilek OC.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):679-84. PubMed ID: 18755618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Bone collected with a bone collector during dental implant surgery].
    Kuttenberger JJ, Hardt N, Rutz T, Pfyffer GE.
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2005 Jan; 9(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 15688239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Histomorphometric evaluation of bone grafts harvested by different methods.
    Berengo M, Bacci C, Sartori M, Perini A, Della Barbera M, Valente M.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006 Apr; 55(4):189-98. PubMed ID: 16618993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Autogenous bone chips: influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentiation.
    Chiriac G, Herten M, Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Becker J.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Sep; 32(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 16104964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rifamycin lavage in the treatment of experimental intra-abdominal infection.
    Jallouli M, Hakim A, Znazen A, Sahnoun Z, Kallel H, Zghal K, Hammami A, Mhiri R.
    J Surg Res; 2009 Aug; 155(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19535094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of autogenous bone grafts, particulate or collected during osteotomy with implant burs: histologic and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
    Coradazzi LF, Garcia IR, Manfrin TM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Aug; 22(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 17465344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intra-oral bone harvesting: two methods compared using histological and histomorphometric assessments.
    Bacci C, Lucchiari N, Valente M, Della Barbera M, Frigo AC, Berengo M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 21070379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Harvesting bone in the recipient sites for ridge augmentation.
    Smukler H, Capri D, Landi L.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 18717380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A systematic review of the effectiveness of bone collectors.
    Graziani F, Cei S, Ivanovski S, La Ferla F, Gabriele M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Aug; 22(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 17974106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of two resorbable membrane systems in bone regeneration after removal of wisdom teeth: a randomized-controlled clinical pilot study.
    Zwahlen RA, Cheung LK, Zheng LW, Chow RL, Li T, Schuknecht B, Grätz KW, Weber FE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1084-91. PubMed ID: 19751357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Risk of bacterial contamination of bone harvesting devices used for autogenous bone graft in implant surgery.
    Takamoto M, Takechi M, Ohta K, Ninomiya Y, Ono S, Shigeishi H, Tada M, Kamata N.
    Head Face Med; 2013 Jan 11; 9():3. PubMed ID: 23311758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cefuroxime, rifampicin and pulse lavage in decontamination of allograft bone.
    Hirn M, Laitinen M, Pirkkalainen S, Vuento R.
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Mar 11; 56(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 15003667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Microbiological profile of donor corneas: a retrospective study from an eye bank in north India.
    Tandon R, Mehta M, Satpathy G, Titiyal JS, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB.
    Cornea; 2008 Jan 11; 27(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18245972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.