These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
118 related items for PubMed ID: 16824171
1. An instrument for assessing public health system performance: validity in rural settings. Driscoll D, Rojas-Smith L, Sotnikov S, Gadsden-Knowles K, Perry NB, Lenaway DD, Halverson PK. J Rural Health; 2006; 22(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 16824171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The forgotten instrument: analysis of the national public health performance standards program governance instrument. Beckett AB, Scutchfield FD, Pfeifle W, Hill R, Ingram RC. J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(4):E17-22. PubMed ID: 18552639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Essential medicolegal death investigation services: standardization of a survey instrument based on the Essential Public Health Services. Drake SA, Nolte KB. J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):1034-40. PubMed ID: 21496017 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of a survey instrument for community health improvement. Bazos DA, Weeks WB, Fisher ES, DeBlois HA, Hamilton E, Young MJ. Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 36(4):773-92. PubMed ID: 11508639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A screening survey to assess local public health performance. Miller CA, Moore KS, Richards TB, McKaig C. Public Health Rep; 1994 Aug; 109(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 7938387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A self-assessment process for accreditation preparedness: a practical example for local health departments. Erwin PC, Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation. J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 19823155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New data, same story? Revisiting studies on the relationship of local public health systems characteristics to public health performance. Bhandari MW, Scutchfield FD, Charnigo R, Riddell MC, Mays GP. J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010 Aug; 16(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 20150791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Aligning public health financing with essential public health service functions and National Public Health Performance Standards. Brooks RG, Beitsch LM, Street P, Chukmaitov A. J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009 Nov; 15(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 19525774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of validity of the national public health performance standards: the local public health performance assessment instrument. Beaulieu J, Scutchfield FD. Public Health Rep; 2002 Nov; 117(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 12297679 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Piloting a state health department accreditation model: the North Carolina experience. Reed J, Pavletic D, Devlin L, Davis MV, Beitsch LM, Baker EL. J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 19202406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey. Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 17133189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation]. Giraldes Mdo R. Acta Med Port; 2008 Jan; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Surrounded by quality metrics: what do surgeons think of ACS-NSQIP? Neuman HB, Michelassi F, Turner JW, Bass BL. Surgery; 2009 Jan; 145(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 19081472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]