These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures. Jones TC. Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 16020379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Process demands of rejection mechanisms of recognition memory. Odegard TN, Koen JD, Gama JM. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 18763906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The development of recollection and familiarity in childhood and adolescence: evidence from the dual-process signal detection model. Ghetti S, Angelini L. Child Dev; 2008 Mar; 79(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 18366427 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing theories of recognition memory by predicting performance across paradigms. Smith DG, Duncan MJ. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):615-25. PubMed ID: 15099130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Wixted JT. Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):152-76. PubMed ID: 17227185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Editing (out) generated study words in a recognition exclusion task: Effects of response signal delay and generation procedure. Jones TC. Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):712-29. PubMed ID: 16829488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Yonelinas AP, Parks CM. Psychol Bull; 2007 Sep; 133(5):800-32. PubMed ID: 17723031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Probability of target recollection varies with target-lure relatedness under the dual process signal detection model. Dopkins S, Galyer D. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Oct; 201():102933. PubMed ID: 31739089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic. Gallo DA, Bell DM, Beier JS, Schacter DL. Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):730-41. PubMed ID: 16829489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Recollection rejection of false narrative statements. Brainerd CJ, Reyna VF, Estrada S. Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):672-91. PubMed ID: 16829486 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule. Starns JJ, Hicks JL, Marsh RL. Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection. Yonelinas AP, Dobbins I, Szymanski MD, Dhaliwal HS, King L. Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries. Pratte MS, Rouder JN, Morey RD. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 20053058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recollection is a continuous process: implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory. Mickes L, Wais PE, Wixted JT. Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 19320859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics. Healy MR, Light LL, Chung C. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):768-88. PubMed ID: 16060779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]