These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

356 related items for PubMed ID: 16830333

  • 1. Sensitivity of motor unit potential analysis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
    Podnar S, Zidar J.
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Oct; 34(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 16830333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Predictive values of motor unit potential analysis in limb muscles.
    Podnar S.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):937-40. PubMed ID: 19329356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Probabilistic muscle characterization using quantitative electromyography: application to facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
    Pino LJ, Stashuk DW, Podnar S.
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Oct; 42(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 20740628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. A quantitative electromyographic study.
    Stübgen JP.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 47(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 17557650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography in the evaluation of muscular dystrophy severity.
    Derry KL, Venance SL, Doherty TJ.
    Muscle Nerve; 2012 Apr; 45(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 22431083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Motor unit changes in thoracic paraspinal muscles in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    de Carvalho M, Pinto S, Swash M.
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jan; 39(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 19086064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the complexity of motor unit potentials in anal sphincter electromyography.
    Podnar S, Zalewska E, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Apr; 116(4):948-56. PubMed ID: 15792904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relationships between clinical data and quantitative EMG findings in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
    Dorobek M, Szmidt-Sałkowska E, Rowińska-Marcińska K, Gaweł M, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I.
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2013 Apr; 47(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 23487289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Surface detected potentials of normal and reinnervated motor units: a simulation study for muscles consisted of short fibres.
    Dimitrova NA, Disselhorst-Klug C, Trachterna A, Dimitrov GV, Rau G.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 12056337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Turns amplitude analysis of the orbicularis oculi and oris muscles.
    Farrugia ME, Kennett RP.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2550-9. PubMed ID: 16221560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of parametric and nonparametric reference data in motor unit potential analysis.
    Podnar S.
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Nov; 38(5):1412-1419. PubMed ID: 18816623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Size of motor unit potential sample.
    Podnar S, Mrkaić M.
    Muscle Nerve; 2003 Feb; 27(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 12548527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of sensitivities of macro EMG and concentric needle EMG in L4 radiculopathy.
    Ulas UH, Cengiz B, Alanoglu E, Ozdag MF, Odabasi Z, Vural O.
    Neurol Sci; 2003 Nov; 24(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 14658043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.