These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas. Johnson A. Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA. Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA. Dickinson Law Rev; 1990 Sep; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH. Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC. John Marshall Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Of ice and men: the big chill over women's reproductive rights. Raymond JG. Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990 Nov; 3(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11649281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution. Tweedt DE. Temple Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable. Heller S. Washburn Law J; 1990 Nov; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]