These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

284 related items for PubMed ID: 16846869

  • 1. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
    Malomo OO, Kuti O, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Sule SS.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
    Huchon C, Raiffort C, Chis C, Messaoudi F, Jacquemot MC, Panel P.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.
    van Bogaert LJ, Misra A.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 19358028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
    Galaal KA, Krolikowski A.
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
    Komoto Y, Shimoya K, Shimizu T, Kimura T, Hayashi S, Temma-Asano K, Kanagawa T, Fukuda H, Murata Y.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.
    Weerawetwat W, Buranawanich S, Kanawong M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87(9):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15515998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study.
    Højberg KE, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher NJ.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):741-5. PubMed ID: 9740522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z, Zareian P.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.
    Hull DB, Varner MW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):818-21. PubMed ID: 2030849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Short-term effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a prospective randomized study.
    Anteby EY, Kruchkovich J, Kapustian V, Gdalevich M, Shenhav S, Gemer O.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20144167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Peritoneal suture vs. non-suture at caesarean section].
    Mocanaşu C, Anton E, Chirilă R.
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2005 Dec; 109(4):810-2. PubMed ID: 16610179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].
    Doret M, Gaucherand P.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 18495379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery.
    Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, Husslein P.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 174(4):1366-70. PubMed ID: 8623871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Towards a simplification of caesarean section technique: non-closure of peritoneum?].
    Malek-Mellouli M, Ibrahima S, Ben Amara F, Néji K, Bouchneck M, Youssef A, Nasr M, Zouari B, Reziga H.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2011 Oct; 40(6):541-8. PubMed ID: 21764225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section.
    Orji EO, Olaleye AO, Loto OM, Ogunniyi SO.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Dec; 48(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 19133045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
    Kapustian V, Anteby EY, Gdalevich M, Shenhav S, Lavie O, Gemer O.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Parietal peritoneal closure versus non-closure at caesarean section: which technique is feasible to perform?
    Altinbas SK, Cenksoy P, Tapisiz OL, Beydilli G, Yirci B, Ercan Ö, Dede S, Kandemir O.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1128-31. PubMed ID: 23350686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.
    Lyell DJ, Caughey AB, Hu E, Daniels K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 16055575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.