These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

215 related items for PubMed ID: 16847729

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF.
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
    Skaggs G, Wolfe EW.
    J Appl Meas; 2010 Jan; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Practical considerations in equating progress tests.
    Langer MM, Swanson DB.
    Med Teach; 2010 Jan; 32(6):509-12. PubMed ID: 20515383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM, Gross LJ.
    J Outcome Meas; 1997 Jan; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior.
    Safrit MJ, Cohen AS, Costa MG.
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 2489859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E, Adams RJ.
    J Appl Meas; 2007 Dec; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations.
    Lunz M, Suanthong S.
    J Appl Meas; 2011 Dec; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM.
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005 Dec; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Developing examinations that use equal raw scores for cut scores.
    Swanlund A, Smith E.
    J Appl Meas; 2010 Dec; 11(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 21164230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Convergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinations.
    Hess B, Subhiyah RG, Giordano C.
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 17986670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Longitudinal stability of IRT and equivalent-groups linear and equipercentile equating.
    Zhang X, McDermott PA, Fantuzzo JW, Gadsden VL.
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Aug; 113(1):1303-25. PubMed ID: 24340818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.
    Gierl MJ, Lai H, Turner SR.
    Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.