These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

273 related items for PubMed ID: 16860582

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA, Kramer C, Mozziconacci JC, Sherman W.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct 27; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
    Wu Y, Brooks CL.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov 22; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.
    Ravitz O, Zsoldos Z, Simon A.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Nov 22; 25(11):1033-51. PubMed ID: 22076470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z, Sun H, Yao X, Li D, Xu L, Li Y, Tian S, Hou T.
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May 14; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV, Novikov FN, Stroylov VS, Kulkov V, Chilov GG.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec 14; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Flexible ligand docking using evolutionary algorithms: investigating the effects of variation operators and local search hybrids.
    Thomsen R.
    Biosystems; 2003 Nov 14; 72(1-2):57-73. PubMed ID: 14642659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli AM, Clarke B, LaLonde J, Lambert MH, Lindvall M, Nevins N, Semus SF, Senger S, Tedesco G, Wall ID, Woolven JM, Peishoff CE, Head MS.
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct 05; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H, Buning C, Rarey M, Lengauer T.
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr 27; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.