These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

306 related items for PubMed ID: 16864490

  • 1. Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss.
    Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):934-40. PubMed ID: 16864490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach.
    Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 17364328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Podskarbi-Fayette R.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Jan; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
    Lorens A, Polak M, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children.
    Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1407-13. PubMed ID: 17597232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Matusiak M, Porowski M, Skarzynski PH, James CJ.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012 Aug; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hearing preservation after complete cochlear coverage in cochlear implantation with the free-fitting FLEXSOFT electrode carrier.
    Helbig S, Baumann U, Hey C, Helbig M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 21730882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S, Van de Heyning P, Kiefer J, Baumann U, Kleine-Punte A, Brockmeier H, Anderson I, Gstoettner W.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR, Gnadeberg D, Ambjørnsen K, Mack KF, Winter M.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
    Helbig S, Baumann U, Helbig M, von Malsen-Waldkirch N, Gstoettner W.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008 Jul; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.
    Cullen RD, Higgins C, Buss E, Clark M, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Dec; 114(12):2218-23. PubMed ID: 15564849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, Van de Heyning P.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Adunka OF, Buss E, Clark MS, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Angeli SI, Germani R, Messiah S, Arheart KL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K, Pok SM, Schloegel M, Filzmoser P.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.