These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Sarić D, Mandić Z, Iveković R, Geber MZ, Benić G, Tomić Z, Grgić D. Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Frequency-doubling perimetry in examination of open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defect]. Wu L, Suzuki Y, Kunimatsu S, Araie M, Yao K. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 38(12):717-20. PubMed ID: 12654219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma. Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma]. Kampmeier J, Eisert B, Buchwald HJ, Lang GK, Lang GE. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population]. Li JJ, Xu L, Zhang RX, Sun XY, Yang H, Zou Y, Zhao JL. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry. Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups. Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M. J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry. Horn FK, Brenning A, Jünemann AG, Lausen B. J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry. Landers JA, Goldberg I, Graham SL. Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 121(12):1705-10. PubMed ID: 14662589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y. J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields. Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16361671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis. Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K. Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM. J Glaucoma; 2007 May; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling thresholds. Maddess T, James AC, Goldberg I, Wine S, Dobinson J. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Nov; 41(12):3827-32. PubMed ID: 11053282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]