These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
176 related items for PubMed ID: 16870403
1. Dynamic removal of oral biofilms by bubbles. Parini MR, Pitt WG. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2006 Sep 01; 52(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16870403 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of Streptococcus mutans biofilm by bubbles. Parini MR, Eggett DL, Pitt WG. J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Nov 01; 32(11):1151-6. PubMed ID: 16212576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal of oral biofilm by sonic phenomena. Pitt WG. Am J Dent; 2005 Oct 01; 18(5):345-52. PubMed ID: 16335477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct 01; 17 Suppl 2():68-81. PubMed ID: 16968383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of oral biofilms by bubbles: the effect of bubble impingement angle and sonic waves. Parini MR, Pitt WG. J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec 01; 136(12):1688-93. PubMed ID: 16383051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the Sonicare toothbrush on the structure and thickness of laboratory grown Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Heersink J, Costerton WJ, Stoodley P. Am J Dent; 2003 Apr 01; 16(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 12797563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy transfer, volumetric expansion, and removal of oral biofilms by non-contact brushing. Busscher HJ, Jager D, Finger G, Schaefer N, van der Mei HC. Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Apr 01; 118(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 20487007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A study of the efficacy of ultrasonic waves in removing biofilms. Nishikawa T, Yoshida A, Khanal A, Habu M, Yoshioka I, Toyoshima K, Takehara T, Nishihara T, Tachibana K, Tominaga K. Gerodontology; 2010 Sep 01; 27(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 20491951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Saliva-promoted adhesion of Streptococcus mutans MT8148 associates with dental plaque and caries experience. Shimotoyodome A, Kobayashi H, Tokimitsu I, Hase T, Inoue T, Matsukubo T, Takaesu Y. Caries Res; 2007 Sep 01; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17426402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The bacterial biofilm and the possibilities of chemical plaque control. Literature review]. Gera I. Fogorv Sz; 2008 Jun 01; 101(3):91-9. PubMed ID: 18756844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal of Dental Biofilms with an Ultrasonically Activated Water Stream. Howlin RP, Fabbri S, Offin DG, Symonds N, Kiang KS, Knee RJ, Yoganantham DC, Webb JS, Birkin PR, Leighton TG, Stoodley P. J Dent Res; 2015 Sep 01; 94(9):1303-9. PubMed ID: 26056055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral bacterial adhesion forces to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket-adhesive-enamel junction in orthodontic treatment. Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Chen Y, de Vries J, Ren Y. Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Aug 01; 117(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 19627354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials--an in vitro study. Fúcio SB, Carvalho FG, Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM. J Dent; 2008 Oct 01; 36(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 18621456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]