These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 16879266

  • 1. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
    Kirschner B, Simonsen K, Junge J.
    Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
    Kirschner B, Simonsen K, Junge J.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May 26; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
    Bentz JS.
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov 26; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
    Liverani M, De Paola F, Danesi S, Fedriga R, Dalbuoni V, Agnoletti R, Amadori AR, Mirra F, Bonoli W, Saragoni L.
    Pathologica; 2006 Dec 26; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology.
    Schledermann D, Ejersbo D, Hoelund B.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Nov 26; 34(11):780-5. PubMed ID: 17041948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. DCS liquid-based system is more effective than conventional smears to diagnosis of cervical lesions: study in high-risk population with biopsy-based confirmation.
    Longatto Filho A, Pereira SM, Di Loreto C, Utagawa ML, Makabe S, Sakamoto Maeda MY, Marques JA, Santoro CL, Castelo A.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May 26; 97(2):497-500. PubMed ID: 15863150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, liqui-PREP versus the conventional pap smear.
    Park J, Jung EH, Kim C, Choi YH.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Aug 26; 35(8):488-92. PubMed ID: 17636495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
    Williams AR.
    Cytopathology; 2006 Apr 26; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endometrial carcinoma detected with SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology: comparison with conventional cytology.
    Patel C, Ullal A, Roberts M, Brady J, Birch P, Bulmer JN, Wadehra V.
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec 26; 20(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 19207308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid-based cytology: a follow-up study.
    Schledermann D, Ejersbo D, Hoelund B.
    Cytopathology; 2004 Jun 26; 15(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 15165271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
    DeMay RM.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar 26; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePath liquid-based cytology system.
    Narine N, Young W.
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug 26; 18(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 17578516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervical cancer screening in the 21st century: is it time to retire the PAP smear?
    Wright TC.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun 26; 50(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 17513921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Integrating HPV testing for primary screening?].
    Riethmuller D, Ramanah R, Pretet JL, Mougin C.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb 26; 37 Suppl 1():S139-51. PubMed ID: 18191912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Results of the implementation of liquid-based cytology-SurePath in the Ontario screening program.
    Colgan TJ, McLachlin CM, Cotterchio M, Howlett R, Seidenfeld AM, Mai VM.
    Cancer; 2004 Dec 25; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 15481083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
    Depuydt CE, Benoy IH, Bailleul EJ, Vandepitte J, Vereecken AJ, Bogers JJ.
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec 25; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May 29; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.
    Akamatsu S, Kodama S, Himeji Y, Ikuta N, Shimagaki N.
    Acta Cytol; 2012 May 29; 56(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22846595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M, Daltveit AK, Thoresen SO, Nygård JF.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan 23; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S, Morrell S, Zuo Y, Baker D.
    J Med Screen; 2008 Jan 23; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.