These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
179 related items for PubMed ID: 16884308
1. The physicochemical challenges of designing multiple ligands. Morphy R, Rankovic Z. J Med Chem; 2006 Aug 10; 49(16):4961-70. PubMed ID: 16884308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of target family and functional activity on the physicochemical properties of pre-clinical compounds. Morphy R. J Med Chem; 2006 May 18; 49(10):2969-78. PubMed ID: 16686538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral delivery of G protein-coupled receptor modulators: an explanation for the observed class difference. Beaumont K, Schmid E, Smith DA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2005 Aug 15; 15(16):3658-64. PubMed ID: 15982884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Current status of virtual screening as analysed by target class. Stoermer MJ. Med Chem; 2006 Jan 15; 2(1):89-112. PubMed ID: 16787359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. GLIDA: GPCR-ligand database for chemical genomic drug discovery. Okuno Y, Yang J, Taneishi K, Yabuuchi H, Tsujimoto G. Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jan 01; 34(Database issue):D673-7. PubMed ID: 16381956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Time-related differences in the physical property profiles of oral drugs. Leeson PD, Davis AM. J Med Chem; 2004 Dec 02; 47(25):6338-48. PubMed ID: 15566303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual exploration of the chemical universe up to 11 atoms of C, N, O, F: assembly of 26.4 million structures (110.9 million stereoisomers) and analysis for new ring systems, stereochemistry, physicochemical properties, compound classes, and drug discovery. Fink T, Reymond JL. J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Dec 02; 47(2):342-53. PubMed ID: 17260980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rational Modification of the Biological Profile of GPCR Ligands through Combination with Other Biologically Active Moieties. Huang G, Nimczick M, Decker M. Arch Pharm (Weinheim); 2015 Aug 02; 348(8):531-40. PubMed ID: 25941009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Designing active template molecules by combining computational de novo design and human chemist's expertise. Lameijer EW, Tromp RA, Spanjersberg RF, Brussee J, Ijzerman AP. J Med Chem; 2007 Apr 19; 50(8):1925-32. PubMed ID: 17367122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fragments, network biology and designing multiple ligands. Morphy R, Rankovic Z. Drug Discov Today; 2007 Feb 19; 12(3-4):156-60. PubMed ID: 17275736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physicochemical effects in the representation of molecular structures for drug designing. Gasteiger J. Mini Rev Med Chem; 2003 Dec 19; 3(8):789-96. PubMed ID: 14529498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of physiochemical property profiles of development and marketed oral drugs. Wenlock MC, Austin RP, Barton P, Davis AM, Leeson PD. J Med Chem; 2003 Mar 27; 46(7):1250-6. PubMed ID: 12646035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Are target-family-privileged substructures truly privileged? Schnur DM, Hermsmeier MA, Tebben AJ. J Med Chem; 2006 Mar 23; 49(6):2000-9. PubMed ID: 16539387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of the relationship between topology and selectivity for druglike molecules. Yang Y, Chen H, Nilsson I, Muresan S, Engkvist O. J Med Chem; 2010 Nov 11; 53(21):7709-14. PubMed ID: 20942392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel 2D fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening. Ewing T, Baber JC, Feher M. J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Nov 11; 46(6):2423-31. PubMed ID: 17125184 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding in medicinal chemistry. Kuhn B, Mohr P, Stahl M. J Med Chem; 2010 Mar 25; 53(6):2601-11. PubMed ID: 20175530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role and significance of unconventional hydrogen bonds in small molecule recognition by biological receptors of pharmaceutical relevance. Tóth G, Bowers SG, Truong AP, Probst G. Curr Pharm Des; 2007 Mar 25; 13(34):3476-93. PubMed ID: 18220785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge-based chemoinformatic approaches to drug discovery. Ghose AK, Herbertz T, Salvino JM, Mallamo JP. Drug Discov Today; 2006 Dec 25; 11(23-24):1107-14. PubMed ID: 17129830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols. Evers A, Hessler G, Matter H, Klabunde T. J Med Chem; 2005 Aug 25; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowledge-based analysis of multi-potent G-protein coupled receptors ligands. Faure P, Dubus E, Ijjaali I, Morlière C, Barberan O, Petitet F. Eur J Med Chem; 2010 Dec 25; 45(12):5708-17. PubMed ID: 20933307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]