These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1690 related items for PubMed ID: 16900523

  • 1. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
    Bastian PJ, Gonzalgo ML, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Presti JC, Mangold LA, Humphreys E, Epstein JI, Partin AW, Freedland SJ.
    Cancer; 2006 Sep 15; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Dorey F, Presti JC, SEARCH Database Study Group.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun 15; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ, Presti JC, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Aronson WJ, Dorey F, Amling CL, SEARCH Database Study Group.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun 15; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Is there a difference in outcome after radical prostatectomy between patients with biopsy Gleason sums 4, 5, and 6? Results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ, Amling CL, Terris MK, Presti JC, Aronson WJ, Elashoff D, Kane CJ, SEARCH Database Study Group.
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2003 Jun 15; 6(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 12970733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ, Wieder JA, Jack GS, Dorey F, deKernion JB, Aronson WJ.
    J Urol; 2002 Jul 15; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun 15; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Dorey F, Presti JC.
    Cancer; 2003 Dec 01; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predicting unilateral prostate cancer based on biopsy features: implications for focal ablative therapy--results from the SEARCH database.
    Scales CD, Presti JC, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Amling CL, Freedland SJ, SEARCH Database Study Group.
    J Urol; 2007 Oct 01; 178(4 Pt 1):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17698131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT.
    J Urol; 2005 Sep 01; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of preoperative prostate specific antigen density and prostate specific antigen for predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the search data base.
    Freedland SJ, Kane CJ, Presti JC, Terris MK, Amling CL, Dorey F, Aronson WJ.
    J Urol; 2003 Mar 01; 169(3):969-73. PubMed ID: 12576824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Factors affecting recurrence rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above.
    Kupelian PA, Buchsbaum JC, Elshaikh M, Reddy CA, Zippe C, Klein EA.
    Cancer; 2002 Dec 01; 95(11):2302-7. PubMed ID: 12436435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
    Noguchi M, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Yemoto CM.
    J Urol; 2000 Nov 01; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 85.