These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Running in new and worn shoes: a comparison of three types of cushioning footwear. Kong PW, Candelaria NG, Smith DR. Br J Sports Med; 2009 Oct; 43(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 18801775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners. MacLean C, Davis IM, Hamill J. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 16603287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes. Dixon SJ. Ergonomics; 2008 Oct; 51(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 18803091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical and anatomic factors associated with a history of plantar fasciitis in female runners. Pohl MB, Hamill J, Davis IS. Clin J Sport Med; 2009 Sep; 19(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 19741308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Hamill CL. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1983 Sep; 15(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 6645865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of motion control shoes on the running gait of mature and young females. Lilley K, Stiles V, Dixon S. Gait Posture; 2013 Mar; 37(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23122596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in running kinematics and kinetics in response to a rockered shoe intervention. Boyer KA, Andriacchi TP. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Dec; 24(10):872-6. PubMed ID: 19744753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in plantar loading between training shoes and racing flats at a self-selected running speed. Wiegerinck JI, Boyd J, Yoder JC, Abbey AN, Nunley JA, Queen RM. Gait Posture; 2009 Apr; 29(3):514-9. PubMed ID: 19147359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of orthotic devices prescribed using pressure data on lower extremity kinematics and pressures beneath the shoe during running. Dixon SJ, McNally K. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Jun; 23(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18355949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running. Eslami M, Begon M, Farahpour N, Allard P. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of running in military boots with new and degraded insoles. Dixon SJ, Waterworth C, Smith CV, House CM. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Mar; 35(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 12618578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, Hamill J, Davis IS. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Feb; 38(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 16531902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]