These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid? Kimura S, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements. Berntsen DA, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. PowerRefractor versus Canon R-50 Autorefraction to assess refractive error in children: a community-based study in ecuador. Virgili G, Angi M, Heede S, Rodriguez D, Bottega E, Molinari A. Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Feb; 84(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17299345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of confidence number on the screening accuracy of the retinomax autorefractor. VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDY GROUPThe Vision in Preschoolers Study Group, The Ohio State University, College of Optometry, Columbus 43218-2342, USA.. Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 17435531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children? Howard C, Firth AY. Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 16909076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation. Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Sakla HF. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 17720072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Examination of preschool children for refractive errors. First experience using a handheld autorefractor]. Büchner TF, Schnorbus U, Grenzebach UH, Stupp T, Busse H. Ophthalmologe; 2003 Nov; 100(11):971-8. PubMed ID: 14669034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection]. Benes P, Synek S, Petrová S, Sokolová SJ, Forýtková L, Holoubková Z. Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis. Bailey MD, Twa MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Jones LA, McMahon TT. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction. Cleary G, Spalton DJ, Patel PM, Lin PF, Marshall J. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of accuracy of refraction measurement in children up to the age of 15 years using the PowerRef II and by standard techniques]. Osmera J, Korynta J. Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2005 May; 61(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15981493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]