These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


231 related items for PubMed ID: 16909083

  • 21. Peripheral refraction measurement: does it matter if one turns the eye or the head?
    Radhakrishnan H, Charman WN.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 18201338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K, Parker KE, Cheng H, Applegate RA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
    Salmon TO, Horner DG.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor.
    Dahlmann-Noor AH, Comyn O, Kostakis V, Misra A, Gupta N, Heath J, Brown J, Iron A, McGill S, Vrotsou K, Vivian AJ.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 93(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 19001013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.
    Jeganathan VSE, Valikodath N, Niziol LM, Hansen S, Apostolou H, Woodward MA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30451804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the "PowerRefractor" in a pediatric practice.
    Schaeffel F, Mathis U, Brüggemann G.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):630-9. PubMed ID: 17632312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cox regression was used to compare the measurement error of two tests vs. a gold standard.
    Virgili G, Angi M, Molinari A, Casotto V.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 60(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 17346607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: refractive error and its relationship to cup/disc ratio.
    Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2275-81. PubMed ID: 19041480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The effect of off-the-visual-axis retinoscopy on objective refractive measurement.
    Jackson DW, Paysse EA, Wilhelmus KR, Hussein MA, Rosby G, Coats DK.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 137(6):1101-4. PubMed ID: 15183796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Rubio M, Hernández CS, Seco E, Perez-Merino P, Casares I, Dave SR, Lim D, Durr NJ, Lage E.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children.
    Chat SW, Edwards MH.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 11261351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of refractive techniques.
    McKendrick AM, Brennan NA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Dec; 66(12):758-65. PubMed ID: 8557954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Random measurement error in visual acuity measurement in clinical settings.
    Leinonen J, Laakkonen E, Laatikainen L.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Jun; 83(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 15948786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.